7800x3d vs 13700k productivity reddit. It's much faster in both mt and ST tasks.


VERSION DU LOGICIEL PHOTO CARTOON

Créez des effets photo HD illimités avec notre puissant logiciel PC Windows

software

Where is the blind spot detection sensor located. there is Lane Change Assist, and Blind Spot Detection.

7800x3d vs 13700k productivity reddit. From my research, the 13700k is slightly better than 7900x, but it uses more wattage and is an LGA1700 cpu, which will supposedly not be used next year. When you consider this, the 7800X3D seems way better. Also update the bios and you are fine, well check your SoC voltage so it's less than 1. Use case matters. So I've been looooooong overdue for an upgrade. The only advantage the 7800X3D spec sheet shows is the 96MB of L3 cache, which is roughly 4 times that of the 13700K. 7800X3D cons : price too high for just 8 cores,not great for workload,streaming,etc. ago. Although personally I'd rec either 13th gen intel or a normal 7000 series amd cpu if you have any serious non-gaming needs (ie if you use your machine for a job The 7800X3D is 5-10% better for games (highly depends on the games, look it up for the games you want to play). A 3090 TI was also used to test applications. The Ryzen Nah, my 13700k is delided with a 5. So, my rule of thumb is generally to do some digging, Find out which is more suitable for your needs. Productivity is a little worse on the x3D chips. I'd get the 13700K unless the PC is only for gaming. If gaming and productivity (coding, compression, rendering etc) in equal measure are what you're looking for, then the 14700/13700 is a better buy. The 7800x3d is 15% slower than the 13700k in premiere acording to Peuget bench. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now 7800X3D vs 13600K vs 13700K for a 1440p Build Build Question 7800x3d if you game and do light Like HUB, Jarrod used a 4090 to test games. Because you need to buy a z690 z790 board for the 13600k peak performance. The i7 bundle has a lower end board, but it still has good Vrms as well as having 8+8 power. I will choose after CPU because I have a limited budget but in the future I planning to upgrade the GPU of course if I . Rust just seems to be one of those games that runs much better with the extra Cache. 83% faster in applications. Roughly what is the performance difference in percentage between those CPU in the title. 13700K will be better for video editing 7800X3D will better for gaming, both processor are good for streaming, intel have some good codecs embedet in CPU but you can compenzate it on AMD CPU with INTEL ARC GPU or NVIDIA GPU. Thanks! 7800x3d isn't great with productivity but it's usable. 51% slower than the R7-7700X in gaming 1080p and 22. It needs over 100W for its performance. I also play a large variety of games, mostly GPU intensive but some that are CPU intensive as well. The 7800X3D and 13600K builds have 3200MHz, but the 13700KF build has 3600MHz, which is sweet for that CPU. It also reduces the total build cost by allowing for a smaller power supply and more moderate cpu cooling solution. If you frequently do productivity work, get the 13600K instead, or you can always get the 7700X if you so chose. The $449 Ryzen 7 7800X3D, which comes to market in April, is expected to deliver the lion's share of 3D V-Cache's gaming performance for $150 less than the 7900X3D, making it a viable contender for value seekers. ••. Intel variation: i7 13700K + Asrock Z790 Steel Legend + 2* 16GB RAM (CL36, 5200MHz) AMD variation: Ryzen 9 7900X + Asrock X670E Steel Legend + 2* 16GB RAM 32GB RAM (CL36, 5200MHz) GPU I planning to start RTX 3060 Ti or RTX3070. The i7 is 2. 7800x3d will perform better in games, but for what you need, 13700k is already decent. App: 7800x3d is 100%, i5-13600 is 106%, i7-13700 is 122%. Simply put, just get a 7800X3D or 13700K, as they fit your needs better. The problem is that I have seen that many people are having problems with this new am5 So in theory would the 13700k be better than the 7800X3D due to it's slightly better single-core performance. I can't convince you of anything. It was the asus z790 p prime vs the Z790 TUF. gen intel will be the last CPU for 600 and 700 motherboard chipset and then they will change the socket for newer 7800X3D wins in gaming easily. If gaming is the first concern and production second, then 7800X3D is still totally fine. Compared to the 13900K, the 7800X3D achieves an average lead of +3. RAM: 32gb ddr4, 3600, cl16 (already owned) For example, mine pulls about 25 watts in gaming. Don’t need the “really” it’s just not. And am now finding myself having to choose between the 7800x3d and 13700k. superrob1500. The actual single-threaded core speed is slower than the 13700 though and as such the 13700 will have more consistent performance in gaming, not to mention background and productivity tasks. The verdict is not uniform here either: 6 reviews still favor the Intel processor, the other 13 Personally, I'd still go for the 13700K(F). It's always a tradeoff. The 7800X3D is the better choice for gamers. Gaming 1440p: i5 is 90%, i7 is 94%, 7800x3d is 100%. 0%. The reason for is that the v-cache on the X3D chips wasn't designed for productivity work in mind. 7700x with 8 cores 16 threads are a very capable CPU for productivity. I'd also think an A380 would be the better call for encoding (or alternatively just use the QSV of the 13700K). both overall same-ish for gaming. 6ghz all core OC running with 7600mhz CL34. The 13700K obliterates it in multithreading though. Another dilemma is the motherboard. Is the 14700K even better than 7900X for productivity and is the 14900K worth spending $200 extra over the 7900X. We can see that the 13700K has an advantage in core count, thread count, and clock speeds. 2023). Look up some reviews about how it performs in the programs you use and judge if how much time you spend with those programs is worth it vs gaming. You’ll have a good CPU that is capable of anything. Jul 5, 2023 · The 7800X3D shines in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor, delivering 21% more performance than the 13700K at 1080p. Yeah I was thinking of the 13700k to but at microcenter the 13900k deal was like less then 200 extra and came with a better motherboard. It's much faster in both mt and ST tasks. So as the limit for i7 is 253W, the amd is only drawing 50W during TLOU. Apr 16, 2023 · The $449 eight-core Ryzen 7 7800X3D is the new high-performance gaming champion for the desktop PC. That's less, but by themselves, these averages look unremarkable in both cases, which is why not everyone was impressed by the 5800x3d initially. The 7800x3D will handle wow at 1440p without issue, it's gonna be more about if you have any big non-gaming use cases for the system. The 7950x is the only competitive buy. I can't imagine the A750 making much difference versus the A380 or the iGPU of the 13700K. And still can't decide. It's also pretty comparable to the 7800x3d in most games, though there are outliers. 7800X3D pros : platform will support at least 2 more generation,much less power draw and heat. The Intel seems to statistically outperform the Ryzen chip in literally every category, but apparently the Ryzen chip has 14% better memory latency. Also the $140 price difference will also be lessened. I have the 7950x3d, I use it for games and for work. 5800x3d was 44% faster than its predecessor. i7 13700k vs Ryzen7 7800x3D. There are a few noteworthy differences between the 7800X3D and i7-13700K specs. They both do well in your other "productivity" category usages, 13700k is better in heavy cpu tasks. • 1 yr. Hopefully, this provides you some insight. Suddenly, the much maligned HUB video comparing the R5 7600X and i5-13600K does not seem so far fetched. Bigger competition = better prices for us and that is always good news, because corps going without competition for longer periods of time get bold with aggressive pricing. On average of 19 launch reviews, the 7950X3D is still ahead of the 7800X3D by +1. There's a reason why 14th gen comes with a bunch of L4 cache. I'm happy I didn't buy 13600k yet. The Microcenter bundle is kinda unbeatable for gaming performance. The 13900k is obviously better, but the price difference for me was $200 and I used that to help pay the DDR5 ram off (which cost $235). SAM is not AMD exlusive, R-Bar is an option with Intel systems and does the same. 14900k is better for high thread workloads or memory dependent workloads. It's way better for productivity. The 7800X3D performs equally to the 13600K in For blender and rendering the 13700K will absolutely smash 7800X3D. 13 or 14k all day. Intel does a very good job on the productivity front, though. For gaming, you will most likely be GPU limited, so these small differences in CPU won't matter. Nah, at 4k you wont notice any difference. If it's worth it or not depends 100% on you. You go with 13900k to get the best price performance. I'm looking at using a 3080 to pair with the CPU as the 4000 series seem So yeah, the 5800X3D is a stupid choice for a new PC and gets either beaten (gaming) or even absolutely demolished (productivity) by the 13700K for the same price. On average the 7800x3d had 11% better performance. 1% lows on Intel being alot better. Then you have the overall build pricing being significantly cheaper for Intel. For context, the cup will be going into a pc with a RTX 4080 and will be cooled by an EK Nucleus CR360 RGB AIO in the Lian Li O11 Dynamic Evo case. burnabagel. I’d originally had my mind set on going with the 13700k because I’d heard it was one of the best chips to be paired with the RTX 4080 and was in general just a beast for both gaming and production. I don't know how much L3 cache affects performance, but I wouldn't be surprised if the 7800X beats the 7800X3D in Clausewitz engine PDX games. The difference is probably smaller in newer games, and larger in older games. 14900K: +$200 more compared to 7900X. It is also much easier to cool because it consumes far less energy and therefore it exhausts less heat and allows a more silent operation. -3. As the title suggests, I'm undecided between the 13700K and the 7800X3D. It would be a build for 1440p at 165Hz. First and foremost it is faster in gaming. 7800x3D performs way better at lower power consumption. And if you're gaming at 1440p with a 4070 or 4070-ti, you probably won't notice the benefits of the extra cache in most games. 7600x, 7700x, and 7900x are basically DOA. Intel also enjoys cheaper motherboards and also DDR4 memory support which means overall, a Core i7-13700K system can be a lot cheaper than an equivalent Ryzen 9 7900X one. I've seen youtubers reference it as AMDip. If you have a bunch of AV1 media, I could see using the iGPU, but the QSV on the 13700K is surprisingly powerful for encodes/transcodes. So, given this panorama, the other option I have is to go to the 13700K, which although it is not the best in gaming, its performance is similar and surpasses the 7800X3D in productivity. For gaming the 7800X3D will perform better, for productivity it won't be as great. I'd go with the 7800X3D for this one. 13600k beats 7800x3d in everything except gaming in general. To complete my recommendation, 7800X3D is a good choice if you game a lot and is used to turn off your computer while not using it (because idle power draw is bad for the AMD cpu). 95% gaming = 7800x3d. 7800x3D is not bad for productivity, 7800x3D is as capable as a 7800x 7700x for productivity, maybe even a little bit more with the help of that huge cache. Apr 6, 2023 · This is Ryzen 7 7800X3D vs. Remark: i7-13700KF Build: This one is pushing the budget a bit, especially with the extra fans. HUB got an 11% delta between the 7700x and 7800x3d. The 13700k has more cores so it will last a little longer for productivity. I have a question nobody brings up when comparing 13700K vs 13900K. Oof. Oct 19, 2023 · The Ryzen 7800X3D has 3D cores, with extra cache making it have fast load times for running timelines. 13600k beats the 7600x, and slightly beats the more expensive 7700x. You go with 14900k if you want to max out performance. With that cooler under load, my CPU is sitting comfortably at around 60-65c. The build would cost 3015€ (225€ more than the original): CPU: 5800x3D. FYI the only Intel CPU that trades blows in games with the 7800x3d is the 13900k/14900k , so going with the 13700k will be better for productivity but will be a downgrade for gaming. After reading various benchmarks and forums, I'm inclined towards the 13700K because it performs about 30% better in productivity tasks, even though it averages a 10% decrease in FPS in gaming compared to 14700k might be a better choice for lots of video editing and productivity in general. Look at ACC in both reviews. The 13900K uses 50-200 watts more in games, oof. JuanElMinero. Just get the 13700k of your are worried about productivity. ) Less power = less heat, so you can put a much cheaper cooler on the 7800x3d. Sure the FPS performance gains are minimal but definitely exist. Extreme workstation users may find value in the 13700K or 13900K. Intel is faster in quite a few tests and is also cheaper with the Ryzen 9 7900X retailing for around $80 more than the Core i7-13700K. 7800x3D doesn't need a premium board to perform at its peak. If the budget is a strict limit, you might need to reconsider some components or tweak the fan setup. mobo: b550. Get the 13700. If power consumption is a concern the AMD chip is the better choice as well though the 13700K could be undervolted to mitigate this a bit. You should look at the average results to compare them in general. I've lurked on here forever. no surprise there, the 7800x3d is a gaming cpu and not a productivity cpu really. But the 7800x3D will be faster for gaming but only worth it a 1080p. As I intend to keep this motherboard for a while, I’m going to upgrade to the 14900k in No. 14700K: +$50 more compared to 7900X. Even with 13900K you would gain 1-3 fps at most on average over 13600K, hence 13700K. the 13700K is more for productivity related stuff, and from my experience the CPU intensive elements of Total War tend to run better on AMD's CPUs. This means the power gap is actually bigger since the GPU is working harder in the 7800x3d system than in the 13700k system. If gaming is what you're looking for, the best is the 7800x3d. In games it doesn't really matter, with the 4070ti both will perform exactly similar. Most games I’ve tested so far have only shown a 5-8% increase. However, the Core i7 processor is also 22% faster than the Ryzen 7 7700, so AMD's 3D V Apr 16, 2023 · The 7800X3D doesn't fare much better against the like-priced $417 Core i7-13700K in productivity apps, either — the 13700K is 22% faster in single-threaded and 51% faster in multi-threaded. The delta in the app performance is larger than the gaming performance. Uses less power and more upgrade paths. Also 7950x3d has lower base clock than the non-3d version, actually, it has the lowest base clock of all the x-variants, so single core performance, where most Hollownerox. Expo is stable Just don't go above 6000Mhz and there is unlikely to be issues, expo is just a memory profiles TLDR: the 7800x3d is better or equal in 90% of cases, uses much less power, and is a cheaper total cost than the 14900k. 7800X3D vs 13700K. Especially in productivity both i5-13600k and i7-13700K look really great value kicking ass for the Zen4 competing models. 4. That's on average double the power usage. Even though the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is much less expensive than its competitors, it’s still 12% It really depends on the game engine. I use But then, by choosing this route I could afford a 4090 instead of the 7900xtx, and in 2-3 years I could just change mobo+cpu (which together cost almost the same as the 7800x3D). Have a blessed day. You go with 13700k to save some money. Here's the price difference between the builds for me: 7900X. And maybe I can finally play some better games. 2%. Hey guys, I found both of the listed CPUs for basically the same price and was trying to compare the two. 1440p & 4k both CPUs will be neck and neck. The 13700k is really just consuming that much more power. 13700k is much faster in most productivity tasks. •. I'll be using my computer to do stuff like video encodes and Photoshop, mostly. Reply. Would be interesting to know if the deciding factor is more cores in general or specifically the presence of some higher clocked standard cores. 14700k cons : power draw,heat,a dead end platform,only 8 real cores and the rest are e cores. 14. For games, I mostly play single player RPGs and strategy games, no competitive e-sports. intel is intel, AMD is AMD, they're both good. 2. As I understand it, the i7 will be the better option for you since it generally will meet or exceed performance in games that don't leverage V-cache while also having the advantage in Premiere. 13700k beats the 7700x and slightly beats the more expensive 7900x. I use May 27, 2023 · The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is able to get peak performance at a power of 162W, while the iCore i7-13700k will draw up to 253W for the same. 3V, some issues with gigabyte not listening to settings. Its higher stock frequency doesn't matter since you can overclock the 13700k and match it. At first I had planned to put a 7800X3D, since I have seen that it is the best for gaming, it is easy to cool (it barely heats up) and it does not do bad at all in productivity tasks (although it is not the best). Even a $20 aircooler can easily cool it. i7-13700K. Gamers on a tight budget can save $40 USD with a 13600KF which is a 13600K without integrated graphics. 13700k follows the same, in that if you're only gaming, you'd do better with 7800x3d, but if you're doing anything else, 13700k would be best. The 7800X3D is a great gaming chip due to the extra cache, but for productivity related tasks it falls behind its standard 8 core siblings due to lower clock speeds. My work is primarily with machine learning and ai models. I got my 13700k from newegg for $350. Some games prefer AMD, some prefer Intel. For Cyberpunk, the low 1% numbers for the 7800X3D and generally better 1%s with higher core AMD CPUs seem to be cosistent across multiple reviews. Maybe a few edge cases, but IMO it's not enough to outweigh the weaknesses in productivity. If you do anything else with the PC, the 13700K beats it in everything else. I mostly didn't even recommend x3d outside of 7800x3d because based on 5800x3d and the benchmarks AMD released (although it's probably a bit biased) it should be a great gaming chip. It's only relatively slower than the competition, not u for productivity the 7900x as it'll boost it's clocks higher than the X3D variant, for any gaming you shouldn't notice any difference at 4K as you'll mainly be GPU limited on framerate anyway. I guess the i9 also has some extra cache which can help but the difference is minimal and doesn't even remotely justify paying the extra. 13700k destroys in productivity but falls short in gaming. Also one other concern I forgot to list but I keep seeing brought up is 1% and 0. Although Ryzen 7000 has weaker multi-core, weaker single-core, higher platform costs and higher unit prices AMD have a 3D joker up their sleeve (7800X3D est. The rating of the reviews is by no means uniform, 7 see the 7800X3D in front, 11 the 7950X3D. If you want multithreaded performance, get the 14700/K/F instead. If it's gaming first, probably the 7800X3D. If it were me, I'd go with 13700k, but I also use my computer for However, not all games benefit from the 3D V-Cache tech equally, and there are reductions in productivity application performance. 7800x3d is better in gaming, 13700k is better for productivity, you are mixing it up. I'm looking to build a pc with the ability to play on 4k resolution however, I'm also planning to stream and video edit (not necessarily at 4k). Those 12 e cores and quick sync definitely help speed things up. There are always outliers. Watched hours of comparison videos. And the intel 13700k has 16 cores, and is good in workstations and timelines. You can’t go wrong with either option. The only thing that the 13900k has over the 13700k is 8 more e-cores which are completely useless for gaming. So for all around PC, I would go Intel i7. 7800x3d is about 10-15% faster in gaming, leagues more power efficient, can be upgraded in the future. It is was purely for gaming the 7800x3d is definitely more ideal. I primarily use the PC for gaming and creating 3D models for DnD. (The 14700k will pull about 120-150 in the same game, depending on settings. The problem I have with this CPU is that it gets incredibly hot and of course, people recommend an AIO for this reason, but I want to put an air cooler like It was already known that the 7800X3D is the better CPU for gaming and almost disgustingly efficient compared to Intel. The ryzen bundle board has 8+4 but is a nicer strix board. The 7800X3D does benefit greatly in specific games from the increased cache which is amazing in those cases. But it’s close enough with your discount that both are good options. Definitely the right call not to make your decision based solely on FPS, but while anecdotal, I would say even factors like turn times seem As a reference, 13600k beats 7700x in everything except some gaming titles. OK so I need some help deciding on my next build. kw xg eb ty ek ak rs bj gf yv